Showing posts with label Hypnotism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hypnotism. Show all posts

Friday, April 11, 2014

OVERLAPPING MINDS AND MULTILAYERNESS. (MIND POWER -6)




(Excerpts from book: MIND POWER (1980) CH 11, Author - Swami Vijnananand (S.V.), Manashakti publication)


Let us understand multi-layer ness of life. . This is a step by step life story of Aphid (a small insect harmful to plants) (* The strange things in the world; page 140)

STEPS:

1.      Stem mother – a newly hatched female
2.      Injects the substance into the leaf and the house builds itself around her.
3.      Inside the house she passes through four stages.
4.      Her structure changes four times completely, four times, i.e. she becomes in a sense four different animals one after another.
5.      In the fourth stage she gives birth to 50 to 100 living young.
6.      Each of these young in turn goes through four stages.
7.      In the last stage they have wings.
8.      The winged insects crawl out through a hole in the gall. (leaf house)
9.    Each produces 10 to 20 young on the bottom of the leaf.
10.  Each of the young, in turn, goes through five stages.
11.  During the last stage they are both male and female.
12.  This is the first and only time; the male makes its appearance in the life cycle. All the other births are by pathogenesis. (Reproduction without fertilization)
13.  Each of the female lays eggs on the witch hazel. (liquid from a bank of a particular tree in N. America. The buds are destined to become leaves in the early spring. The eggs lay above hatch a few days before the leaves appear.)
14.  New aphids, all female, come out from the hatched eggs. (This is step one i.e. stem mother, a newly hatched female.)

The female aphid hatched from the egg injects some of the house building material into the leaf, upon which she finds herself. She becomes a new stem mother and the strange life process continues all over again. The phenomenon (can be illustrated as) multi- layer ness of life

We have another interesting reference. (Clock of Living Nature, page 106)

Every organism has a multitude of rhythmic processes with cycles of different duration. The more complex is the organism, the more intricate is the symphony of its rhythms.

Same tissue participates in the construction of different organs and has different rhythms.

The smooth muscle of the wall of intestine executes 10 to 15 oscillations per second.  The same muscle as a component part of the digestive track has rhythm with cycles of one to two hours. As a part of the organization, the muscle tissue of the intestine also has a diurnal periodicity (taking a day to complete an oscillation). To this phenomenon N.Perma gave the name “Multi layer Ness of Life.”

11.1     Mind proved. : -- Cell changing “use” or “longevity”. 

Nobel Prize winner Dr. Sherington tells:- If a piece of part of the embryo which is to be the main nerve cord be removed and its place given to other skin and taken from a region not destined to be nerve cord at all , then – The new graft not originally destined to be a nerve cord , becomes nerve cord. The embryo at this stage seems to be pervaded (totally perceived in every part) by some general plan which compels each of its localities, whatever prominence of material there, to become what is demanded there as a part of the eminent (respected) plan.

In the embryo frog, the cells destined to be brain can be replaced by the skin or the back, the back even of another embryo. These (cells) after transplantation become brain cells in their new host and stem to serve the brain purpose duly.

The cells of some organs are harder, less complex, and more stable. Irreversible changes take a longer time to come to those harder cells. The cells of other organs are delicate and vulnerable. They (the cells of the organ) begin to disintegrate sooner, giving rise to earlier reversible changes.

Some cells live quite longer after their owner’s death. They are for instance the cells of the hairs, nails, the epithelia of the skin.

The tissues of the body turn out, much more sensitive to cold than the tissues removed from it. This is highly surprising; it should have been the other way round.

Cells behavior, after death of a person

Generally speaking man dies when his cells die, particularly of those of the central nervous system and the most important organs; but; more precisely, man dies but some of his cells are still alive. The hairs and nails, for instance, grow some times after a person’s death.
At Professor Kravkov’s laboratory, as has been observed, fingers cut from corpses continued to live. A fluid that was much like blood was passed through their vessels, sustaining a life in them for a week or longer. Experiments of that kind show that not all cells perish when a person dies.

(i)  Kulyabko, the Tomak physiologist did with thyroid glands what Karkov has done with the fingers, that is, he introduced some Ringer-Locke fluid into the excised (completed removed) gland’s artery. The fluid circulated through the gland and emerged from the opening of the vain. Kulyabko collected it as it flowed out and discovered that contained the hormones of the thyroid gland. The gland was by no means dead. It was alive and contained its hormones. Clearly, some organs of corpse long retain their vital properties, provided they are placed in a suitable medium...

(ii)This is also true of more complex organs. Prof. Kulyabko performed another astounding experiment.  He placed a dark, roundish somewhat elongated meaty object into a unique apparatus with glass and rubber tube and a small electric motor. The meaty object was an ordinary human heart. The Prof. had taken the little motor, pumped through Locke’s solution a variety of nutrient medium into the heart by the glass and rubber tubes. And the heart of a day old corpse began to beat.

(iii)                         Bryukhonenko and Chenchulin, two Mosco physiologists made another remarkable experiment. They beheaded a dog and made its head live for a while. It opened its eyes, closed them in a strong light and opened them again. When acid was supplied to its lips, its tongue licked it off. The head even pricked up its ears at the sound of a whistle. Bryukhoneko and Chechulin sustained the head’s life by passing a nutrient medium through its arteries.

11.2     Cell systems have flexibility:

(i)                             Variation in work.
(ii)                           To do the work which they normally don’t.
(iii)                         Cells recognize each other in danger.

11.3     Qualitative layered differences of mind….. Using cell structures as only vehicles

We have already seen (in 11.1,) that replacement of one cell in the avenue of another organ also works. We have also seen the next supremacy of the cell from the cerebral cortex. In aggregate, it amounts to “cell mind” having a different entity choosing “cell mechanism” merely as a vehicle to carry out its own end.

So on one hand the inferences are:-

-          Mind of each cell has its own ends.
-          It has its own convenience.
-          Mind has its own strengths as well as weaknesses.  And lastly,
-          Mind uses the cell mechanism merely as a vehicle, so that, whatever may be the ‘organized’ cell-structure, cell mind can ‘fashion’ it according to its own needs.

On the other hand this means - All we have seen, there is a qualitative difference in these cell minds right from nails to cerebral cortex and beyond it the “Organized Mind”. This suggests the layer of qualitative aspect within the individual whole.

11.4. “Discretion” beyond matter: - Proved by Antibody. (Antibody = a substance formed in the blood to fight against disease.)

Antigen is a substance capable of stimulating formation of anti-body. Let us see what is antibody. Antibody is a protein produced in an animal when a certain kind of substance (an antigen) which is normally foreign to its tissues gains access to them. The antibody combines chemically with the antigen. Antigens are mostly proteins or carbohydrates, and every different antigen stimulates production of one or more antibodies of a kind specific to itself, i.e. each antibody combines with a specific antigen and no other antigen. Importance of antibody formation is defense mechanism of vertebrates against invasion particularly by bacteria and viruses. Antibodies are not formed in plants. When parasites or their poisonous products enter the tissue, the animal produces antibody fluids. This antibody formation is stimulated by antigen forming part of, or produced by the parasites. A given parasite is likely to bear several antigens, some peculiar of its species therefore they evoke several sorts of antibodies, equally specific. In some cases different pathogens (Disease creating agents) have the same antigen, so that immunity to one confers immunity to another. (e.g. vaccinia and small pox). The combination of antibody with antigen kills or immobilizes parasites or makes them more susceptible to phagocytes to make their poison harmless.

It is still uncertain, where in the body, antibodies are formed. But once produced, they are found mainly in the blood, and may persist there long after disappearance of the antigen, conferring immunity to a new infection by the same sort of parasite. Immunity to diseases from vaccination or inoculation is due to antibodies. Substances quite unconnected with parasites can act as antigens when injected, e.g. almost any foreign proteins.

Wisdom of antibody “unknown” in science

Carefully looked the definition tells us that …. Anti-body’s action is not only against living parasites but also against any foreign protein. Secondly, every different antigen stimulates specific antibody. Such wisdom is beyond the scope of matter. As usual, the definition has also told us “It is still uncertain, where in the body antibodies are formed. How they are formed, is the question not asked and not answered. We find one more declaration of ignorance. (New Biology no.31 A-3, page 106) “The fact is that, from the moment of entry of antigen into a cell to the later emergence of antibody, we know very little of what goes on.” The action of antibody is after all the “quality” initiated by the “quality” of multilayer mind specified for such emergency.

11.5     Brain cells change (?), “Cell growth at will” Darwin.
(Ref. Rich, Ambitious, Healthy, points 5E, 5F.)

We have a ref. of Darwin’s statements, two statements.

(A) He talks about a dog remembering a whistle, when all brain cells are changed, with a period of five years in between. There is definitely a question mark, whether brain atoms (can) change wholesale to that extent. But putting this question aside, granting the change as put forth by Darwin, two things emerge.

(i)       The ‘mental individuality’, to which we called ‘organized mind’, is retained.

(ii)       Though the matter within brain i.e.  Brain cells or atom-matter changes, the cell mind continues to hold the wisdom gained.

(B) Another story by Darwin is equally interesting. (It is mentioned that) Changes in bone, weight occurred within six months because mind was convinced of its necessity.

11.6     ‘Not heart alone’ proves multilayer ness, but lungs, kidneys, liver also prove it.

·         We review three stories from science here. (Paths of science,P-31, page 60)
·         In neglected tuberculosis, the lungs tissues disintegrate. But doctors have now learned to cure the disease provided the treatment is begun early enough. If the moment is lost, the disease develops, disintegration spreads over to new areas and the patient is in mortal (that must die) danger.
·         There is disease known as ‘pyonerphrosis’. This disease destroys the kidneys. Morbid changes affect the calyces and tubules, which are the kidney’s most vital parts. If the disease is allowed to progress in both kidneys, it is fatal.
·         One more disease ‘cirrhosis of liver’ is much like tuberculosis and pyonerphrosis. It destroys the tissues of the liver. If allowed to develop, it causes death.

Narrating the three cases, the author adds: Patients who die of these diseases cannot be returned to life after their heart stops beating. The treatment (for heart, immediately after death within six minutes to restore it) accorded by Buyan would be futile in their case. Blood injection would not make them breathe again, not even two of the possible minutes passed after death. These patients need more than a functioning heart to return to life. What they need is ‘sound lungs’ in one case, ‘sound kidneys’ in another and ‘sound liver’ in the third. And medicine, so far, is unable to provide a patient with new lung or liver.

11.7     Death helps forgetting shocks.*
(* Paths of science, P-31, page 62, 64)

We now refer to stories which lead us to prove the “Mind and Multilayer ness of mind”.

A case is of life recovery from shock. (On page 64)

We shall quote how brain cell to have save them-selves. (Page 71 of Paths of science)

·         When the situation deteriorates and blood circulation stops, they try to save themselves from complete exhaustion and ruin by ceasing their function. 
·         If a simple brain cell dies or ceases functioning to ‘save itself’, as the author says, three things become clear:-       
-   Since the cell ‘saves itself’, it returns to life later 
-   It means there is some thing in cell beyond matter.
-   Though brain cells gave way, other layers of cell minds continued.

Multilayer ness of mind is again proved, with the organizing mind that bridges the whole individuality.

11.9     Belief in existence after death at all levels.

11.9.1 Cell level:-

- Suicide bags: There is a ref. to suicide bags in cells which are otherwise called as Lysosome. In cell structure there are tiny parts where energy is “manufactured”, and energy is released. If for any reason, the cover of the lysosome is broken, that eats the cell body itself.

- Lysosome fulfill extremely important function in cell and it is now realized that far from being suicide bag they form a building mechanism for enabling the cell to adapt metabolically to rapidly changing conditions of food supply, oxygen concentration and other environmental factors which occur in many living systems.

- We shall check-up three earlier refs.

(a) Lysosome: It is clearly essential for the digestive enzymes to be rigorously segregated from the rest of the cellular content, to which they could cause irreparable damage. (That is why they are covered separately and the covers are called suicide bags.) They are particularly numerous and large in cells such as macrophages.(A large white blood cell, occurring principally in connective tissues and in blood stream that ingests foreign particles and infectious micro-organisms by phagocytes). These cells perform special digestive functions
Lysosomes are also believed to be involved in the fertilization of the ova, morphogenesis, aging and some diseases. They may play a part in carcinogenesis. (The changing of normal cells to cancer cells.)

(b) Cell injury involves another aspect of lysosome function known as auto digestion or autophagy (controlled digestion). In this, some of the contents of cell itself are engulfed (surrounded to cover completely) by the lysosome and broken down.
When injury is due to starvation, this process enables to use some of its own material for the formation of essential substances no longer available from outside sources, without causing irreparable damage.

(c) Lack of oxygen also affects lysosome.
It seems that, in cell suddenly deprived of oxygen; the lysosome may rupture, resulting in the release of enzymes and the death of the cell by auto digestion.

It is seen clearly from all above references that the lysosome (suicidal bags) seems to be really destructive, though, only under certain circumstances.

S.V. Comments: The mechanism in lysosome to “adapt” is the basis then the life after such a suicide must be assumed.
One wonders, when cancer is one of the repercussions, how that can be in the interest of the organizer? This can be reconciled when we refer to the role of lysosome seen above. The quotation “that far from being suicidal bags” they form inbuilt mechanism for enabling to adapt. When in practice, the description of “suicidal bags’ cannot be under rated, the ‘suicide’ function of the lysosome should be grunted (should be considered as low key function or not so harsh function), i.e. they are adapting not destructing. Alternatively, if the mechanism to ‘adapt’ is in the interest of organism, life after such suicide must be assumed.

11.9.2 At the human level.

From the relevant references of man dying of ‘his will’, are provided in ‘know your death’ (another book by S. V.) on part nine point three, page 106.

11.9.3.      At animal level.

Mind’s existence beyond death and Mind’s multi layered ness.

·         Jatinga village in Assam: Nature continues to hold mysteries which seem quite beyond capacity of human to explain “adequately”. An Indian zoological team has confirmed what might otherwise have been dismissed as a fabricated folk tale or superstition of unsophisticated villagers. Year after years, on dark and stormy nights thousands of birds flock to just one village – Jatinga in Assam, where they are attracted by lights set up by the residents. What is so strange is that once they land, they make no attempt to escape and allow them to be killed or captured on the spot. This phenomenon was first sighted in 1905. The scientific team led by Dr. Sudhir Sengupta just cannot come up with even an intelligent hypothesis for the remarkable phenomenon.

·         Lemming (mouse like rodents): Whenever the population

S.V.Comments:  Here at least, one can guess that in the interest of the preservation of the species as a whole, nature has so programmed the genes of the Lemmings. But why in Jatinga, of all the places, do all manners of birds from bulbul to woodpeckers get afflicted (to cause trouble, pain or distress.) with death wish?
At all these levels one would see multi layer ness and the instance of death provide us the clue of inner belief of mind existence beyond death.


11.10 All body changes in seven years, yet knowledge remains.

It has been estimated that a human being has a new body every seven years, the time it takes for the old cells of the body to be replaced by new ones. Even if statistically accurate this figure is very misleading since it does not provide a reasonable picture of what is taking place around the different types of cells of the body at any particular stage of existence.

The Brain: - For example, brain reaches its mature size within a few years after birth, while the body as a whole undergoes considerable growth. By this time most of the nerve cells have been laid down even if they have not yet achieved mature size and differentiation. Barring loss through accidents or diseases they will continue to function throughout life at the level of performance.

Nerve cells: - If a nerve cell is destroyed it cannot be replaced by another. Long before its attainment of final form, the potential nerve cell loses its capacity to multiply. (Refer fig. Mind Power page 115) No general nerve cell replacement center exists as is true for blood cells. But there is some experimental evidence to suggest that enriched environment during early childhood can lead to either an increase in small interconnecting neurons or in the number of connections between neurons in the brain.

Muscles: - Recent studies also suggest that muscles are capable of limited replacement when losses occurs. Dividing cells have been found among those farming smooth muscles but as far as striated skeletal or heart muscles, it is far from likely that injury to such tissues is repaired by connective cells forming scar tissues, which lack contractile properties. That an organ remains constant in size is not, therefore indicative of its rate of cell replacement, unless the active turnover rate of cells is known, the constancy of size merely indicates that there is no net gains or loss of cells. The death of old cells can be equaled by the production of new ones.

Some biologists estimate that each day the human body loses one to two percent of its cells through death. The body weight remains constant therefore the dead cells must be replaced by new ones, by billions of cells every day. Since virtually none of these is produced in the muscles or nervous tissues and since muscles and nervous tissues must be equal to about half of the body weight, there must be active center of death and replacement elsewhere.
These would include the protective layers and regions of the blood forming, digestive and reproductive systems. The other organs of the body have much slower replacement rates. A liver cell for example, has been estimated to have an average life span of about 18 months.

Cells have different qualitative layers. (Multi- layer ness of mind)

S.V.’S COMMENTS; - The lesson of the cell development story is eye opening. Knowledge, skill, experience acquired by cells belong to (organizer) mind. This also establishes how the matter changes and the continuing faculty of whatever knowledge, skill, experience acquired by every cell and the whole individual could belong only to mind and not matter.

Mind controls other minds in hypnotism.

Famous book “the world as physiological and therapeutic factor” “Psychic research behind the iron curtain” and many other books on hypnotism focus the attention on one mind having impact on the other. Mass hypnotism through radio, T.V. is additional evidence. All go to establish increasing layers of psycho levels.

Note: - Page 115 of MIND POWER.

The human nerve cell or neuron, which lasts (has a life span) generally as long as the individual and which does not divide once delineated, (completely formed) as a neuroblast, has its origin in tissues known as Medullar epithelium.
The epithelium produces all the varied cells of the nervous system, but the neuron acquires its polarity with its axon and dendrites --- as it is differentiated from a neuroblast to neuron.
The axon, if cut or damaged, can regenerate itself. But if the cell body with its nucleus is destroyed, it cannot regenerate.

11.11 Antibody without Antigen proves Mind: There is an experiment quoted in an international conference on burning problems. A patient with third degree burn injuries can be cured by the blood of a person who was previously recovered from burn injuries.

11.12 Whether Mind controls matter or vice versa: Once it is conceded that a cell has a mind illusive question remains why the sense organs themselves should not be accused of encircling mind, for their own ends of pleasure? This question is a tricky one.

At birth, it was the ‘organized mind’ that must have been the first architect. He collected or chose suitable cell empire for his own ends. One can suspect that it is a game of mutual convenience played between ‘organizing mind’ and ‘all cell minds’. But certainly this game cannot start, unless initiative of the organized mind is accepted. Slightly a coarse simile will serve the purpose.

Organizing mind acts like a gang leader, who enlists the support of like minded subordinates. In the end the over-stressed gang men that is rebelling cells, moot the revolt. What we call disease or death. Assuming for a moment that the cells in various organs dictate the ‘organizing mind’ for their own luxuries, why the ‘organizing mind’ not deny the slavery? It would well rebel, resign or ab-initio it may not accept the role of ‘organizer’ at all. One more alternative is, the organizing mind can commit suicide as many do. As we checked elsewhere, all deaths are chosen deaths by organizing mind (part nine of ‘Know your death’).

Concrete case (Illustration.)

Suppose a cell of the eye agreeably encounters a mango. By themselves eyes would be contented to ‘look’ at the mango color. But process does not stop here. The information of eye cells is passed on to the cells of the Cerebral Cortex, where the ‘organized mind’ correlates this information to the tongue and also the hand division through the motor area of the brain, so that the mango is picked by the hand and destination tongue is reached. Inferentially, therefore, when various cells might have their own limited desires, the organizing mind cannot eschew (avoid) its responsibilities.

An eye cell for instance, as a single microbe, might have searched its food in the pond, now evolved as an eye cell gets its ready food through an integrated system called “man”. Therefore, eye cell participates in the game. Yet the piloting point of all individual freaks remains organizing mind. At integrated level, we know, fingers can work as “eyes’ to a limited extent.

In essence, “desire” of cell is limited. Comparatively, organizing mind dominates.

Crude process from Birth to Death

1 “Organizing mind” invites suitable like-minded subordinate cell minds, to rally round to fabricate body.

2 For mutual convenience to some extent, but predominantly because of organizing mind’s over powering demand, body cells remain over acted. (They have to over exert themselves.)

-          This over action goes on (then sometimes) damaging cell accelerates their somatic renovation every ninety days or so.
-          When still over-stressed, cell rebuke (to express sharp or severe disapproval) alerting the organizing mind by some disease.

Organizing mind given to unabated (limitless) pleasures, finally riches limit having no spare energy to continue organization of the somatic cell empire and abdicates (leaves kingdom) it. That is so called death.

In Nov. 78, Jim-Janes and his people's Temple followers at Jonestown, Guyana committed mass suicide. Nine hundred people committed suicide. Jones was accused of pressuring people, though psychological study does not fully endorsed it. 'Science Today' March 1980 page 21 records "One such People's Temple member was recently quoted as saying: 'Had I been in Jonestown on 18 Nov., 1978, I would have been the first in line to take the poison if I had been so honored".

Addition to point 11.6 and 11.9.1 - "Cell saves itself" - means brain verses mind

In 11.7 of the original work, there is a reference that the cell saves itself by ceasing to exit. Cells of the cortex 'die quicker' or in other words, 'cells save themselves', has significance. Brain cells, as if die quicker, as a first casualty. On one hand, they die earlier as a punishment for their despotic rule. And on the other hand, they have to leave such a way partly because of their long-standing rebel against mind. Students of English history can compare this situation with the changing role between the King and parliament, where each side differed with the other and tried to extract advantages from its counterpart. During these engagements, the luck changed often, this way and that way, where the final victory was claimed by democracy. Likewise, there is a conflict between the organizing mind and brain, where the latter can be compared with the prime minister. At one stage, brain, the prime minister derives its power from the king, while differences with King-mind increase. Page 67 to 71 of "Rich, ambitious and healthy" has described changing relationship between mind and body cells. Cortex cells as a prime minister can also be compared with theatre actor who performs his role for selfishness, efficiently. But not necessary that the actor is one with the aspirations of the sentences he utters on the stage. His apparent oneness with his role is a mirage, purposeful or otherwise, and this actor on the stage may have conflict with his pay master, behind the stage.

Summary:

-          Mind of each cell has its own ends. It has its own convenience. Mind has its own strengths as well as weaknesses.
-          Mind uses the cell mechanism merely as a vehicle, so that, whatever may be the ‘organized’ cell-structure, cell mind can ‘fashion’ it according to its own needs.
-          There is a qualitative difference in cell minds right from nails to cerebral cortex and beyond it is the “Organized Mind”. This suggests the layer of qualitative aspect within the individual whole.
-          Importance of antibody formation is for defense mechanism of vertebrates against invasion particularly by bacteria and viruses.
-          Wisdom of antibody which is unknown to science is beyond the scope of matter. It is still uncertain, where in the body antibodies are formed.
-          Multilayer ness of mind is proved, with the organizing mind that bridges the whole individuality.
-          At birth, it was the ‘organized mind’ that must have been the first architect. It collected or chose suitable cell empire for its own ends. One can suspect that it is a game of mutual convenience played between ‘organizing mind’ and ‘all cell minds’. But certainly this game cannot start, unless initiative of the organized mind is accepted
-          In essence, “desire” of cell is limited. Comparatively, organizing mind dominates.
-          The concept of multi mind goes further and we see the overlapping multi-minds under the control of the organizing mind from different illustrations provided.

(Note: This is an attempt to make reader friendly interpretation of the book “MIND POWER” based on my perception. Inquisitive readers are requested to refer to the original book to cross check their understanding.)


Vijay R. Joshi.



Thursday, January 2, 2014

LAWS OF MIND (W.M.M. - 8)


Excerpts from book: WHAT MIND MEANS (Author Swami Vijnananand, Manashakti publication).

Chapter 8 - Sleep and Dream Reveal Laws of Mind


1.  Since so far, we have discussed and provided the proof, no rational should hesitate to get convinced about the non-material nature of mind. It would be now worth to understand the Laws of Mind.

These laws will be useful for all of us to understand the rights and responsibilities to which we (as mind) are entitled. If we look around carefully, we get ample hints to observe how Nature fails to guard the Magna Charta (fundamental rights and liberties) of mind.

They are (a) solitude (living alone) (b) Sleep and (C) dreams.

2. Sleep proves Mind independent of body.

Pavlov theory about sleep is taken as a basis to illustrate this point.

Pavlov distinguished sleep in three parts, viz. total, partial and broken up. A section of cerebral cortex called ‘sentry post’ by Pavlov remains awake in the state of partial sleep. Person goes to sleep in night and wakes up in the morning at pre-decided time. This is possible because of the awakening of ‘sentry post’ in partial sleep. When the sleeping effect also covers this ‘waking cortex’ (i.e. sentry post) then there is partial sleep converted in a total sleep.  If this is so, it means that during total sleep no cell of the brain is excluded out of sleep. How then we return to agile (active) activity? To this Pavlov says, “The waking state is maintained by more or less rapidly changing stimuli acting on the cerebral hemispheres mainly from the external world”. What is this stimulus in the external world? And when and how it is available? When it is absent?

For example, a tired person goes to sleep at 7.00 pm then at 4.00 am he will naturally wake up as his sleep duration will be over. At calm and quite morning at 4.00 a.m. which external stimuli wakes him up while all the other members in his home could be in deep sleep?

So this can’t be any external stimuli but it ought to be the internal stimuli which springs to operate and awakes the person. That stimuli (capable of acting when ‘all’ brain cells remain passive) cannot but be non-material and we seek Pavlov granting us a form to reward it the title ‘mind’.

3) Mind controls matter in hypnotic state or partial sleep.

In the hypnotized sleep or suggested sleep we have to carefully look at the hypnotizer’s order to the subject to go to sleep. No command like “go to total sleep or maintain speech contact after sleep” was given. No doubt, in his own mind the hypnotizer did issue these instructions. Does it not then obviously establish that un-uttered intentions of the hypnotizer have, in this case, passed on to the subject. It self-evidently proves how the hypnotized person’s mind independent of matter, took active part in the process. If ‘matter’ was be-all, end-all, the subject would have slept like a dormouse (squirrel) as directed, without additions or subtractions by instinct, right or wrong.

4) Mind is always alert, also in sleep, suggested dreams prove. In a short nap (afternoon sleep), the mind comparatively and perhaps willingly slackens its closely tied authority over body. However, till the organism is alive, body and mind are never distinctly divorced. The discussion on total sleep above has already, though partly, set the question at rest. Moreover, suggested dreams show clearly this fact with still firm convictions. True, that dreams cannot be suggested at will, but in a no way, it diminishes the amazing significance attachable to the suggested dreams. As early as 1925, Russian experts have used medicine of suggested dreams in their cure therapy.

(5) Quite Mind has greatest strength. Normally, each day ends in exhaustion and fatigue. This exhaustion is reduced bit by bit during night sleep. Eight hours sound sleep takes care of energy of 16 hours’ work during the day. Inactive state each night inherit rather inject in us blessing ability to enjoy. Accumulation of potential to enjoy stems from relaxation of bonds between psyche (mind) and soma (body) purposive silence (meditation) and sound sleep apparently confer power, both to fight the battle of life and to enjoy excitement of emotions.

(6) Emotionlessness offers greater bliss: Body not necessary to enjoy

Just calmly and thoroughly consider following. When do you indulge (allow yourself to follow your will) in unimaginable delight?  This is best done only in sound sleep. For rest of the day, your conception of happiness is subjective, relative, comparative and plastic. In serene (peaceful, calm) sleep, it is absolute (complete, perfect).

(7) Dreams indicate: We may suffer without body.

In unsound sleep, body also undergoes dangerous experience as much as thoughts (emotions) physically affect the body. In a deep trance (half conscious sleep between sleeping and awakening), I climb the towering Empire State Building and through myself beneath, my palpitation is accelerated. This happens though my limbs are actually relaxed in my bed. Obviously though mind has chosen to hop over the top of the structure while the other end (mind’s other end) is retained in the material body for the production of appropriate representative repercussions. With this we see a rational inference (conclusion) about minds capacity to drink with pleasure the bitter cup where material flesh is not an absolute requirement. Inferentially, though not conclusively, after-life notions conceived by various faiths (religious) may be true to the extent to which it is deciphered (said/meant) that in after-life, mind is conditioned to extreme agony (extreme, prolonged sufferings) in proportion to its carefree carving. During the life suffering in dreams of cause make marking on body.

(8) Hypnotism, Dreams partial capacity of Mind to go out of body.

Explanation in point 3 above throw light on mind’s restricted ability to go out of physical frame. A thought, though unspoken, can reach other subject and impel him to act. Similarly, it can be said with confidence (asserted) from the paint 7 above that suggested dream put the subject (body) under disturbing/damaging influence and induce mind to spin out (to resolve or rotate rapidly) in the free space of the unfathomable cosmos.

(9) Mind can peep (look partially) into future.

Hypnotic suggestions that work successfully and dreams that come true suggest mind’s capacity to probe into future. Yet this point needs further consideration.

Chapter 9 – Health, Mind and its laws

1)  Truth is frequently stranger than fiction. We consider every disease as physical (related to body). But it is derived (created) from the ‘mind’, which is beyond our world of imagination and understanding. For many centuries the dead bodies (mummies?) are kept in the pyramids in the Egypt. But no studious historian or any person has every reported them taking an infection of influenza, black plague, yellow fever, small pox, cholera, cancer or T-B.  After death, the mind (or life or soul, etc.) makes the (dead) body invalid and passes on to the next adventure (i.e. normally called as rebirth). The body (the one like in Pyramid) never tends to develop any disease after suffering the unbearable tumor of death.

2) The key stone (Base or backbone) of the argument in short is as follows: 

The effects of mind when attached to matter on its own are measurable at a given moment. Resting on this premise (logic) we (S.V.) have described our theory in the four books. One of the major surmises (inference without strong evidence) can be produced in a concise (brief but comprehensive) form:

Emotion = observable Motion (Pulse Variation PV or EEG potentials)
Disease = Observable Motion (     - do -                  )
Therefore 
Emotion = Disease i.e. E = D

Truth: Mind hits body (Desires make body to act i.e. create motion in body for ease i.e. pleasure). In pursuance of the laws of motion as the reaction is equal and opposite, the mind craving for ease earns disease, (not immediately but) after potential capacity of the concerned metabolism (in body) to store disease (i.e. anti-motion created by the hit of desire – emotions) reaches its peak limit. Lastly, it was codified as under:

In truth, there is no emotional outburst. Untruth causes emotions (outburst to the extent of untruth).

Emotions cause disease.
Untruth causes un-ease (disease)
Truth causes ease
(Ease is comparative see question ‘3’ below)

3. In order to understand manifestation (outward perceptible indication) of mind in terms of laws of motion and its relation to health (or happiness), we need to find out answers to following eight questions:

Q.1 – How many gradations has mind like conscious, sub-conscious, Universal and so on ….?
Q.2 – Does mind observe the laws of motion?
Q.3 – If emotion is disease in minute form, should not its reaction bring in ease in obedience to Laws of motion?
Q.4 – Is mind itself machine in the normal sense?
Q.5 – How does mind act while related to body?
Q.6 – Does mind survive after death?
Q.7 – Does not method of auto suggestion subscribe to the view that mind is separate entity?
Q.8 – Can brain be compared to telephone system?

3a) Q.1 – How many gradations of mind exist? 

Mind, reflects obedience to the Laws of Matter at all times and without exception. If the mind resists openly (defies) these laws or it can elude (speedily avoid) them, it must be non-matter to that extent (under reference are laws of matter, limiting speed of matter). No scientist can dis-agree the above statements. May be, in the days to come, improved understanding of nature, will reveal variation of minds. It is conceivable that notion of impurity in mind itself implies sub-division of the mind-entity. Yet it remains a probability at each level a personal lemma (view). Detailed description of mind as advanced by some great spiritualists can never be blindly accepted, nor on the other hand can it be summarily rejected. An unbiased rationalist remains contended to accept. Mind exists independent of matter.

It gives birth to motion (relatively accelerated motion) yet minds unbelievable (strength, ability and characteristics) pre-potency lies in consciously adopted passive (visible/ inactive) state.
Existence of man (birth of human being) is for reasserting these facts and surrendering attachment to the matter. One can trace the links of mind till logic allows. Going beyond is neither necessary, nor possible. For closely understanding the Laws of Nature, it is not necessary to attach fertile fancy imagination to the Nature. (Mind need not be classified further. At least, at this stage)

3b) Q.2 Does mind obey the laws of motion?

Yes. Causality is applicable. Mind motivates body (induces motion in body/disturbs its inertia) which being matter has to abide Laws of Motion. Nobody has explored the mighty mind yet. In the present context, it is futile to imagine its behavior and laws in details after the death or prior to birth. Hardly anything (except/beyond) its bare existence before the birth and after the death can be guessed. Here we are concerned with the mind essentially after its voluntary attachment to matter (body) which is during the life. More particularly with the consideration of health and cure of the serious ailments (diseases) (Refer Book Cure without Medicine, Chapter 8 to 11 for the details).

Scientists do not reject ‘causality’ in one voice. (There may be objection or reservation from same section of scientists) Marxists scientists, Einstein and Plank all support the principle of causality.
In any case, the laws of motion certainly apply in lesser velocities with which we are concerned while considering relation between mind and health or when humanity broods over its 'happiness'. Except nuclear physics which has raised some doubts about the quantum of effect, no thinker worth the name argues that cause produces no effect at all.

Some biologists consider Laws of Physics (Law of Motion included) do not apply to ‘Living’. This hypothesis pre-supposes following:

·         Property of ‘Life’ (mind) beyond the scope of physics.
·         Physics deals with matter and when its laws fail to operate the entity involved in consideration has to be non-matter (mind).
·         The section of scientist who accept effect on body matter to be measure of mind.

For our purpose it is sufficient to emphasis that mind motivates body and the latter (body) abides by laws of Motion.

3c) Q.3 – If mind obeys laws of motion and emotion is a ‘disease’ how can its resultant be also disease. It should give ease following the premise of ‘equal and opposite’.

a) In emotion the mind is notionally at ease in a sense that without revealing that emotional warmth (earnestness) the mind tends to be ‘more’ uneasy. Mind exercises its option (with / without emotions) in favor of nearest route and clings itself to the emotional outburst, to enjoy ease (Ferment's principle of least action).

b) If the material, cell-knit body is assumed to be subjected to motion, distinct from mind, the proposition becomes more or less disentangled (simplified). In such a hypothesis the latter motion that is of mind acts on the former. Reaction on matter in this process is and ought to be bound by laws of motion. In effect the process becomes measure of mind's motion at a given moment.

c)  Both body and mind are in ceaseless motion. Over and above, the former (body) acts under the spell of inherent molecular motion (the body’s cells are made of molecules, which are always in motion) on top of it; is a motion derived from minds motivation. (This means body has three motions – (i) its own organs (for ex. Pulse, heart, brain etc.), (ii) its molecules, and (iii) imposed motion by mind - emotions).

Imagine or believe for a moment that body stays clean (of mind) from the scene. Mind initiates to action itself at the dictate of emotion will duly return to its state of inertia. (Here emotion assumes causal value of mind's brisk activity not necessarily as a different entity; as in steam engine, though steam, as well as engine, are material entities, the first becomes cause of activating the second). Utility of simile is limited. It has already been asserted and asseverated (stated categorically) how mind and matter fundamentally have different properties. Mind set into action cannot indefinitely continue to keep going assuming body obliterates itself (destroyed completely).

Consider an arrow is targeted at a tree and travelling with speed. Even though it misses the aim of tree, still at certain point after its journey the arrow will stop its travel and come to halt. The weakening of motion is attributed to gravitation and atmospheric resistance. Whatever it may be, the fact is certain that a given motion can never continue to be in the same velocity for an indefinite time, and though in its route it may suddenly and temporarily tend to accelerate, it must in due course put on the drag. In short, mind dashing itself on and creating a "fresh" motion for ease, even in the absence of the cell-spun body, at a given stage it would by itself turn into "disease". It cannot be otherwise till "law of force" operates or the law of contradiction remains valid.

In the absence of body too, mind’s irritation certainly would tend to diminish. The retardation quickens due to the ubieties (the property of having a definite location at any given time) of mind. Apparently then, with or without bodily bonds, mind is also loaded with the burden of inner monitoring law of ‘equal and opposite’.

Inherent contradictions of mind: Suppose the ‘Belly God’ feels hungry and has a special liking for chocolates. While eating first few chocolates will be ease, after consuming two dozen cakes of chocolate, he would develop a dislike for chocolates, only temporarily. Eventually, the pampered (excessively cared) will eat other dishes without hesitation or complaint. Had tongue alone (body alone) the choice of liking, there is no reason why the tissues on tongue grow dislike as such. Obviously the ‘dislike’ is to be attributable to mind alone much the same as like. This example shows clearly the internal inevitable contradiction.

(d)  Point (a) establishes that initiative action must be taken to make us comparatively ‘easy’. The moment you accept even unwillingly to the ‘guess’ and insist that in ‘anger’ or (in any emotion) the mind is not ‘easy’ your game is over. You are contradicting yourself. Because once you feel that there is no ‘ease’ in being greedy or affectionate why do you become greedy or affectionate? It is in your hand not to be so. On the other hand, the moment you agree with me (the author) that in emotions dwells the ‘germ’ of disease, you inadvertently agree with the equation, E=D

3(d) Q.4 – If man is a machine, why should he develop disease?

Man is not a machine. Man = Mind + Body (Non-matter + Matter). The body being material accepts the laws of motion. A misgiving is often generated that it strikingly resembles machine. Without the spark of mind, it would be same as machine. Attempts to create mechanical brain have not gone beyond a limit. It is not yet possible to synthesis the first live cell. Whether brains gifted with talent and well advanced and competent discretion comparable to man’s brain can be created artificially? There is no answer to this question.

The machine can’t be on pins and needles (to be nervously waiting to see what is going to happen) nor would it be delighted on its reaching a clue (getting guide to solve problem). Consequently, it would have no ease or disease and so no ill health on that account. Machines need fuel and best quality fuel would be sufficient for its purpose. For a man mere quantity, quality and calories are hardly sufficient.  He hankers (has strong often restless desire) after a good cheer, agreeable surroundings and number of other factors to make him appreciate his bait (allurement), breakfast (food) and banquet (feast, lavish meal). Sense of affection and affliction (suffering, a state of grief) draws a line between machine and living organism. Once the inborn inherent mover embarks in the steam of life (i.e. mind chooses to get associated with body i.e. the moment of conception), it implies death, which is accelerated by emotional characteristic, habit, mannerism, or the like, that is peculiar to an individual.

Obviously, a living organism purchases death instead of eternal life. Extra motion of emotion allures (attract) him. Emotional mind in turn differentiates men from machine and becomes final traceable cause of his death.

Having seen some of the important features of mind; we shall try to understand the mind-body relationship in the next article based on the excerpts of the book “WHAT MIND MEANS”. (To be continued)

(Note: This is an attempt to make reader friendly interpretation of the book “WHAT MIND MEANS” based on my perception. Readers are requested to refer to the original book to cross check their understanding.)

Vijay R. Joshi.