Organized Mind fabricates an "Individual". MIND POWER - 9. (Concluding Part)

Excerpts from book: MIND POWER (1980) CH 14 - 16, Author - Swami Vijnananand (S.V.), Manashakti publication.

‘Organized Mind’ fabricates an ‘individual’, builds around it a net of cells. The fabrication of the individual and net of cells around it is done at ‘whatever quality organizing mind deserves’. Yes! you , I, all of us are surrounded by ghosts , cell by cell , animal by animal , man by man in which individual rests.

14.1. Cell matter common, cell mind ‘as I deserve’

In the following discussions, we have to understand point by point, how the relationship of mind and other surrounding minds make a mark.

Touch of life creates wonderful transformation in a tiny piece of matter:

Body of each cell is comparatively a dead matter. How a touch of life brings about magical transformation to the piece of matter is illustrated below.

⦁ Catalase is an enzyme which in living protoplasm accelerates the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into oxygen and water.

⦁ The reaction can be accelerated by inorganic iron too. But the action of iron is very weak.

⦁ However by uniting iron with special organic substance “pyrrole”, we can make that reaction thousands times more effective.

⦁ Catalase, a natural enzyme, also contains iron with pyrolle, but its action is about ten millions times stronger because it contains in addition a specific protein. This specific difference makes miracle.

⦁ Catalyst power of one mg of iron contained in the catalase complex (of life full protoplasm) is equal to that of ten tones of inorganic iron.

⦁ That is the miracle of a touch of life to a matter.

⦁ Touch of Life gives ten million times strength to the tiny piece. This is a phenomenon which science can’t explain.

⦁ To this transcending (that which goes beyond normal limit) power, we call Mind.

⦁ Since each mind (with its varying desires) differs, it brings in consideration of “deserving”. The external energy at material level, may be common , but the total energy would vary.(as per mind component)
For all our advanced techniques, we have not yet approached the level of rationalism possessed by living Nature.

Two minds in one body:

Before a baby is born, in pre natal stage, the face of the mother turns lustrous, even in case of unwanted child. The pulse rate of the child and mother are different. By all indications, it means two minds in one body.

14.2. At birth, matter and minds meet as they deserve.

14.2.1. Let us check-up references to birth process independent of parents. (This is not very common phenomenon, yet we have noted here the well-known uncommon facts.)

* Parthenogenesis – definition (virgin birth, Nature’s short cut), Development of an egg cell without being fertilized by a sperm cell, it is not a primitive state of affairs. (Dictionary of Biology, T-250, page 172 and Riddle of science, P-23, page 58)

1 Christ was born without the male partner – a clear case of auto birth.
2 King Dasharatha, the father of Ram distributed liquid (payasa) among his three queens, which was supposed to give him sons. Though the cause of birth was that particular liquid, Dasharatha did not consume it, clear case of auto birth.
3 According to one tale a sweat drop of Hanuman helped a birth. A curios cross breed from crocodile type mother. The son was called Makaradhwaj.
4 In case of Krishna too, He entered the appropriate birth place. This was told by the father of Krishna himself; (Bhagawat, part 10, chapter 2).
5 Mahabharata tells us many such stories.
6 Other religions frequently endorse such phenomenon.
7 In the issue of ‘Therapist’ Jan’1911, there is a story of Madam Blavtsky. After her death, she entered into a fourteen years boy, who was dead that time.

All the above may be overlooked and we turn to the present picture in search of corroboration.

14.2.2 The route of birth is clear.

Bodies of the mother and father provide raw material of matter for the ‘new organized mind’. Father, mother as sex dual merely represent factor inequality pervading in fathomless nature.

 -So, father, mother must be taken as mere instruments for new birth.

⦁ While during the birth process the ‘organizing mind’ collects the necessary minds (along with cells) for body fabrication , from where do these minds come from ? How do they cooperate with the ‘organizing mind’?

⦁ The riddle can be solved with pure logic.

⦁ Qualitatively inferior minds participate in the new game; which both have played earlier, somewhere else. Not that they have cordial relation but the tendency we see in the society, has its origin at the root of every birth. For the convenience and selfish end of all, cell minds come together and some of the cell minds do have a vengeance in their heart. They wait till the appropriate time to overpower the ‘organizing mind’.

⦁ The tendencies we see in the society, has its origin on the above lines, at the root of every birth.(Additional references in the book: 8.4, 8.5, 1.9)

Possibilities (With ref. To 1.9 illustrations.)

A. Begin with a much exaggerated possibility about Mr. and Mrs. A. When Mr. A was a child till 4 years, as an angry child, he hits his cells. One of the cells may deteriorate; revengefully turn as would be Mrs. A.  Conspire with some couple as father and mother and later re-enter in Mr. A’s life as his wife. (This can more possibly happen in case of Master A or Miss A).
B. These relationships may have roots in previous existence. (Previous birth or pre life period)
C. Mr. A strikes at his body cells to satisfy his emotions in which his body cells participate with growing inconvenience. A rebelling moment is reached, when a cell mutates. The mutiny is called cancer, or a son or daughter. (More information in point 14.7.2)
D. Many other permutations or combinations with respect to time and relationship may occur.

Analysis and interpretation of displeasures and evils

Accidents, sudden separations, so called untimely deaths need to be analyzed in the light of Nature’s over all tenets. Perhaps such so called mishaps signal settlement of reciprocal accounts.

Apparent strangeness in the argument

It sounds strange that the nearer relative breaths revenge or relative lack specific tenor in Nature. What can be the other surest way to recover all the past dues, except earning the confidence under the garb (cover) of nearest relative? Conversely, that anybody - say in this case , Mr. A strived breathlessly with pleasure for Mrs. A , Miss A, and Master A itself proves that Mr. A owned them this refund. Else, what can be their claim? What is the other possible logic? Nature has fabricated the shrewdest mechanism for establishing ‘just’ process of revenge, in the name of affection. (Revenge cycle in the single life is not rare. Yet long range cycles also exist).

14.3 Rebirth is not “must”

Long revenge phenomenon may be called a rebirth. But rebirth is not must. This point is elaborately discussed in other books by S. V. viz. God Re-considered , Marx proves Rebirth , Science and Philosophy , What Mind means , Know your Death.

14.4 Is reciprocation so exactly minute? Are there ‘Chances’, ‘Accidents’ in Nature?

If you go through the records of the world history from geological, physical, biological, chemical point of view, you will find Nature to be absolutely exact. Many a times, scientists term it as a chance, accident etc. Medicines are normally injected or swallowed to reach stomach. How they reach exactly the actual ailing destination?

Some references:-

1. Total account of body wonders – (Wonderfully Made, Dr. Sharp, M.D., and FRCS).
2. Wisdom of the body – (Man on his Nature , chapter 4)
3. Accidents excluded, complete causality favored – (Purpose of the Universe, chapter 8).
4. How cells recognize each other- (Purpose of the Universe, Point 11.2).

The above references clearly establish the exact and minute relationship in the nature.
Russian thinkers hold that cause and effect relationship is absolute. Causality means: every cause has its effect and no effect will be produced without appropriate cause.

Causality rules at all levels including philosophy:

According to Engels, grain to mountain, all entities are governed by the same law, -- action and reaction, cause and effect. Therefore; the effect that is produced while fabricating each cell of the body; cannot be without a just and an appropriate cause.
Engels specifically has stressed: In Biology as in History of human society, the same law holds good at every stage. But we prefer to dwell here on examples from the exact science, since here the quantities are accurately measurable and traceable. In clear scientific terms, effects produced in the biological field of body building are subjected to previous causes.

14.5. Cell movement Purposeful well directed.

It is seen earlier how cells recognize each other even after eighty years in single existence. They work for unity of body. But we have also seen that the same cell hits back on the individual to form cold or cancer. And we have also seen that cells in the same body, at the time of death try to save themselves. The behavior of the cells is undoubtedly by and large ‘self-motivated’ and their cooperation with the ‘organized mind’ is motivated by merely selfish end which often includes revenge.

14.11. All symbiosis, all alternatives, turn to parasitic.

At interval level, all the cells of the body cause pain during the last journey to death.

⦁ The slave cells rebel.

⦁ Manifest or emotional causes prick thorns from all sides

Externally, enemies act as open enemies, but are fate of friends any better?
Without exception, friends or relatives have to part, and every parting is sad. Nearer the person, the more the agony of parting pain, which remains unavoidable?
After the death of dear ones, life becoming intolerable is a common experience. Yet more common is the rebelling relative, in the name of affection.

Napoleon was doomed by Australian emperor, who first penetrated his life through his daughter and invaded his life under the pretext of marriage.

Chapter six ‘Equation of Happiness’ describes how all four alternatives of death are unilaterally painful.

There is no going back on the assertion that symbiosis in all forms shall turn to parasitic penalty unless, sense (education, nurturing) of equality and justice is introduced.


16.3. The real selfish should eschew inequalities.

Man is accused of being selfish. He is accused of being materialist. But in what sense he is materialist? Does he understand the laws of matter? Does he understand its implications? Does he know the implications of his being in material frame? Unfortunately, 90% of his important functions are not controlled by him. Egoistic ignorance has termed it as ‘involuntary actions’. A man needs a doctor to tell him that his own organs do not need sugar. Doctor knows his organs in general sense. There are so many mysteries for doctors too, growingly when frontiers of cells and viruses are reached. Indeed, the penalties of inequality are engrained in every grain of man.

Inequality in cells nature and behavior

Recollect the reference from “Paths of Science” (P-31). We are told about the inequalities spread over different parts of cell. Time movement of anybody reminds of this fragrant fact. The author on page 60 says, “The cells of some organs are harder, less complex and more stable. Irreversible changes take a longer time to come to these harder cells. The cells of other organs are delicate and vulnerable. They begin to disintegrate sooner, giving rise to earlier irreversible changes. Some cells live quite some time, after their owner’s death...The epithelia of skin, for instance and the cells of the hairs and nails behave this way. The nerve cells of the brain, particularly, the cerebral cortex, are the most delicate and unstable. Irreversible changes occur in them very soon after death.”

What a paradox!! Nails and hairs comparatively remain detached. For this detachment, they (don’t die but) continue to grow after death. On the other hand, brain cells, the helping despot of mind, the supreme commander throughout life, the delicate, un-changing, un-movable depot of higher hierarchy, die quicker. The growing evidence of biological death as compared to clinical death and cell differentiation at the time of death, as shown above are eye opening indicators. On page 67 of the treatise, the author asks “The question arises, why the cells of central nervous system, and particular of those of the central cortex, are so fragile that the change in them becomes irreversible in the short time of six minutes.”

The question, why cortex cells are so fragile so as to die in six minutes, is not answered, and after two pages of jottings, author on page eleven declares that the cell die to “save themselves.” What an explanation!! Can it be accepted without assuming surviving mind to the cell? And again, compare the two quotations above. Some cells outlive death admittedly, and others survive to ‘save themselves’ according to the same author.

In a single individual body, Nature has packed all the lessons. She shows us the horrors and penalties of inequalities, she tells rewards of patient detachment. If the mind cannot accept democracy and treat its own cell subjects just fully, what right has the mind to speak of democracy, justice and right in the external world?

To avoid sacrifice for society, the selfish man puts forth the excuses that I shall serve my family instead of serving the society. Such a selfish soul is advised to be more selfish, and still go within, to find out the implications of the inner laws, within his real self.

16.4. Marxist (materialistic) thinkers capable of rethinking.

We have quoted Marxist (materialist) authorities without any disrespect or implied satire. We are submitting to their honest thinkers to reconsider a part of their stand, when our own inferences lead us to acceptance of equality. A deeper thinking will convince the unprejudiced thinker how this suggested clue alone is the redeeming way. In the age of quantum mechanics, new inferences have emerged. In the work ‘Lenin and Modern National Society, (page 204) the Marxist thinker has said “Unlike other philosophic systems, dialectical materialism does not oppose modern science as a set of rigid propositions given once and for all; its content is enriched and its form changed with every great scientific discovery.”

S.V.’s modest approach:

We do not profess to have invented any great scientific discovery. But certainly, we have drawn the logical inferences from the findings of scientific thinkers like Pavlov, Einstein, Heisenberg and others. Let them be accepted or rejected, with reasons

16.7   From ‘ego’ step down to ‘equality’.

Marxists have spoken about law of contradiction in Nature. We have shown the roots of paradoxes and cycles to be ghosts of inequalities. Elements of ego attempt a break through, with the result that peace, tranquility, equality is disturbed. This is disturbance against natural justice.

What is way out? How can we reconcile?

When natural justice is ignored, when internal cycles of revenge remain unconcealed, it gives impression of paradox. A prudent man has to learn that every pleasure shall be chased by ghost of displeasure. Howsoever, much the beneficiary endeavors to abuse the law by misnomers as ‘ghost’ or paradoxes, such abuses amount to temporary relief, born out of shifting the plane. Abuses hardly absolve the law-hit homosapian. Once this is realized, deciphered, every particle of body should be considered a just and equitable ‘recreating (shaping)’ according to natural law. Condemning the natural law as, paradox, cancer, parasite is only to perpetuate the cycle of revenge with multiplying offences to receive the new penalty in time to come.

“Turn within”: Entropy (second law of thermodynamics.)

In a bid to secure cheap solutions some investigators give new post-dated checks. The latest of such dishonored check is anti-malaria campaign. Report from “Times of India” Bombay edition, dated 4-12-79 says “In the ding dong battle with the man, the mosquito has once again revealed a new strategy which, unless countered quickly and effectively, can spell disaster. For the fight against malaria in recent years has been mainly based on a powerful drug called chloroquine, and this nostrum has lost its punch. A report by the U.N. environmental program says that this protozoan parasite has developed high resistance to the drug. This comes on top of the disclosure that 43 species of malaria spreading anopheline mosquitoes are resistant to a range of potent insecticide including DDT, BHC and carbamates.

After spending astronomical sums on various projects, authorities have realized that it is neither desirable, nor feasible to attempt malaria eradication by conventional means. All that can be aimed for the present to control its depredations and reduce its severity.”

Let us stop our vain fight against Nature and natural laws. End of this Universe is destined to be entropy, which compels equality. (See points 13.8 and 12.4.)

Entropy means equality.

A German chose the Greek word entropy to mean ‘turn within’. (Ref. Cybernetics A to Z, page 105). Turn within then. Address each of your cells, persuade him to a new realization, and make him participate in your heightened existence. In consequence, you shall have blessings of your colleagues; an experience un-comparable.

Here we end with a quotation from a great doctor. Which comes at the end of the book ‘Rich Ambitious and Healthy’ (Written by S.V.) Dr. Kenneth Walker is an impeachable authority in modern science. Yet, his observations would fly in the face of optimists clinging to the day dream, that wonder drugs one day will win Nature and relieve them of their ills.

Dr. Walker asseverates:-

We have measured the sun, and because we have discovered that it is only a star of the second magnitude, we no longer reverence its splendor. God has become an unnecessary hypothesis to the possessor of a little natural philosophy and has been eliminated from the Universe. Many of our fears are due to our illusions concerning ourselves and the lack of any time in our lives. We see ourselves as the sole representatives of mind traveling through space-time in a dead and soulless universe. Sometimes, we may boast that we are conquering ‘Nature’, but Nature does not even fight; she is secure in her possession of us. We may think that with a little more cleverness and contriving, we shall be able to live out the span of our lives, not only with security, but in comfort. This is an absurdity, for there can be no security and no certainty of comfort for anything that breaths and moves.

Summary:

⦁ Bodies of the mother and father provide raw material of matter for the ‘new organized mind’. Father, mother as sex dual merely represent factor inequality pervading in fathomless nature.

⦁ At conception, ‘Organized Mind’ fabricates an ‘individual’, builds around it a net of cells. The fabrication of the individual and net of cells around it is done at ‘whatever quality organizing mind deserves’. Yes! All of us are surrounded cell by cell, animal by animal, man by man who are created based on their past karmas.

⦁ From where do these minds come from? How do they cooperate with the ‘organizing mind’?

⦁ The riddle can be solved with pure logic. Qualitatively inferior minds participate in the new game; which both have played earlier, somewhere else. Not that they have cordial relation but the tendency we see in the society, has its origin at the root of every birth. For the convenience and selfish end of all, cell minds come together and some of the cell minds do have a vengeance in their heart. They wait till the appropriate time to overpower the ‘organizing mind’
.
⦁ Touch of Life gives millions times strength to the tiny piece of the body. This is a phenomenon which science can’t explain. To this transcending (that which goes beyond normal limit) power, we call Mind power.

⦁ For all our advanced techniques, we (human beings) have not yet approached the level of rationalism possessed by living Nature.

⦁ Accidents, sudden separations, so called untimely deaths need to be analyzed in the light of Nature’s over all tenets. Perhaps such so called mishaps signal settlement of reciprocal accounts.

⦁ Is reciprocation so exactly minute? Are there ‘Chances’, ‘Accidents’ in Nature?

⦁ If you go through the records of the world history from geological, physical, biological, chemical point of view, you will find Nature to be absolutely exact. Many a times, scientists term it as a chance, accident etc.

⦁ Cells in the body work normally for unity of body. But the same cells hit back on the individual to form cold or cancer. Some cells in the same body, at the time of death also try to save themselves. The behavior of the cells is undoubtedly by and large ‘self-motivated’ and their cooperation with the ‘organized mind’ is motivated by merely selfish end which often includes revenge.

⦁ Symbiosis in all forms shall turn to parasitic penalty unless sense (education) of equality and justice is introduced.

⦁ Unfortunately, 90% of human body’s important functions are not controlled voluntarily. Egoistic ignorance has termed it as ‘involuntary actions’. A man needs a doctor to tell him that his own organs do not need sugar. Doctor knows his organs in general sense. There are so many mysteries for doctors too, growingly when frontiers of cells and viruses are reached.

⦁ In a single individual body, Nature has packed all the lessons. She shows us the horrors and penalties of inequalities, she tells rewards of patient detachment. If the (organizing) mind cannot accept democracy and treat its own cell subjects just fully, what right has the mind to speak of democracy, justice and right in the external world?

⦁ Author’s (S.V.’s) modest approach: We do not profess to have invented any great scientific discovery. But certainly, we have drawn the logical inferences from the findings of scientific thinkers like Pavlov, Einstein, Heisenberg and others. Let them be accepted or rejected, with reasons.

⦁ The karma of inequality in the past is the root of paradoxes and repeating evil cycles. Elements of ego attempt a break through, with the result that peace, tranquility, equality is disturbed. This is disturbance against natural justice.

⦁ What is way out? How can we reconcile?

⦁ When natural justice is ignored, when internal cycles of revenge remain unconcealed, it gives impression of paradox. A prudent man has to learn that every pleasure shall be chased by ghost of displeasure.

⦁ Howsoever, the beneficiary endeavors to abuse the law by misnomers as paradoxes, such abuses amount to temporary relief, born out of shifting the plane. Abuses hardly absolve the law-hit homo-sapiens. Once this is realized, deciphered, every particle of body should be considered a just and equitable ‘recreating (shaping)’ according to natural law.

⦁ Condemning the natural law as, paradox, cancer, parasite is only to perpetuate the cycle of revenge with multiplying offences to receive the new penalty in time to come.

⦁ Let us stop our vain fight against Nature and natural laws. End of this Universe is destined to be entropy, which compels peace, equality. When the universe in which we live is travelling toward entropy, i.e. equality, we all also should practice equality within our body also with others in our world.

⦁ A German chose the Greek word entropy to mean ‘turn within’.

⦁ Turn within then. Address each of your cells, persuade him to a new realization, and make him participate in your heightened existence. In consequence, you shall have blessings of your colleagues; an experience un-comparable.

⦁ Understanding the nature and educating the mind for just behavior is the way out for the happiness, peace not only in individual life but also for the entire life on the earth.


(Note: This is an attempt to make reader friendly interpretation of the book “MIND POWER” based on my perception. Inquisitive readers are requested to refer to the original book to cross check their understanding.)


Vijay R. Joshi

SYMBIOSIS TO PARADOX (LOVE TO HATE) MIND POWER - 8.

 Excerpts from book: MIND POWER (1980) CH 13, Author - Swami Vijnananand (S.V.), Manashakti publication)

The origin of life: To trace back the origin of life let us return to Virus, from where our discussion mooted. (Chapter1 and 8)

Paradox due to first inequality, (Symbiosis for convenience)

13.1.     Let us review the past discussion, (References from book MIND POWER)

1.           Chapter – 1. So called boundary between life and lifeless, this is termed as virus.

2.                   1.6, 1.7, 1.9 Describe about virus.

3.           8.2      What virus is?

4.           8.3 , 8.4  Dub it as a “free living gene” imposing its will

5.           8.5, 8.6  Information about its working.

6.           8.1     Underlined the original inequality.

7.           10.1    Inequality -- Relevant references.

Similes about unity of revenge within and outside the organization

When we say "this assembly is of the opinion", it might be only 51% of the group, institutional members or elected members in a given context. There are all chances that; either by new election or changing floor by 2% of the people, the opposition will take over the scene, and a resolution of opposite nature can be passed. Right from a dramatic association to a nation, the breakdowns or assimilations take place, Pakistan is created out of India. Sikkim is added to India and Alaska to U.S.A.

13.2.    Pre virus inequalities. (Mind to Matter)

The proofs of the original inequality are overwhelming. Theoretically since every atom in the universe occupies different space and time, every atom has some difference.—this basic fact presumes inequality. Scientists go even further. They say “no two atoms are alike”

Some more references from other MANASHAKTI publications:

Sameness in Nature a concept

Similarity superficial   

Equality unattainable   

Sameness conceptual  

Point 8.1 emphasizes ‘free will to electron’, basically such inherent free will cannot but create inequality by and large. Going to the pre virus states, they could not avoid the differences (i.e. inequalities).

“The segregation of the (coaservate) drops from their environment, this emergence of individual colloidal system was a pledge of their further development. Even the drops which appear simultaneously in the solution differ somewhat from one another as regards composition and internal structure.”

Point 8.1 has referred to references on mind designated to matter.

In any case, inequality in matter itself forewarns of inequality to come, particularly, on the background of 13.3 below.

13.3.    Talk of social equality supports Mind.

There is a very subtle point. Science says Matter has inertia. Matter has no feelings. If life is only matter, the question of inequality in the Matter cannot legitimately arise. Feeling of inequality can only be the prerogative of Non-matter. Chemical compounds may differ, but they have no complexes of superiority or inferiority.

The talk of establishing equality itself gives ‘Non-material’ nature of mind credence, a wide range of other proofs apart.

13.4.    Three paradoxes of Virus (“Lower dictates”)

Viruses: - Are they living things on the way down or inanimate things on the way up? We may never know! Thus a single virus gives birth to three levels of paradoxes.

Paradox one: - Whether virus is life or lifeless.

Paradox two: - Whether it is an end product or beginning of the evolution.

Paradox three: - The smallest riddle infesting troubles the highest animal.

We substantiate the third paradox.

13.5.    Three paradoxes:-Natural justice, revenge.

To understand the above paradoxes and the implication of ‘lower dictates’, we have to understand virus two ways. Some of the biologists feel that virus is a later product of evolution, since virus generally needs a living medium and so it cannot pre date before first living organism itself. This, if accepted, goes against the grain of evolutionists, who prefer step by step evolution in the living form. Both sides have their own logic which can be reconciled if third level of facts is taken into account. The third new consideration is as follows.

·         Scientist Asimov tells us :- “ Once such a nucleic acid molecule was formed, the equivalent of free living gene (or tiny virus) were present in the ocean; and they multiplied at the expense of the organic compound that had been built up all about them by the action of sun.

·         Nucleic acid molecules in the ocean = Tiny virus ----- They multiplied in the presence of sun ------ Original virus, which was not parasite.

These original viruses were not parasites, as there was nothing for them to be parasitic upon” *(Well Springs of Life)

This information reduces the paradox to understandability. Asimov has made virus first spring board of life’s evolution, virus without any wickedness to kill others. Then the wickedness (or bitterness) in the virus seems to be developed in the later stage. What way the reason?

The reason for original inequality

In 13.1 and 13.2 above, we have underlined previous inequalities. These inequalities seem to be fore-running cause of later growing inequalities, in progressive form of living.

Attitude of first virus

As such we must also know that non- revengeful attitude of the first virus on the borderline can be described, merely as the relative stage. In pre-virus stage of existence, their desire of revenge could not be vocal. They (pre-virus stage objects) marked time and scored over others. In turn others too had an upper hand. Just a see saw.

By this logic we must perceive how their first so called inherent or potent viruses might be subjecting somebody else to torture, when, they did not know at that stage. But that does not mean absence of such revenge phenomenon, once the cyclic processes are accepted. Inequalities, we spoke of in point 13.2 are the original inequalities.  We find progressive account as follows.

Coaservate drops: Survival/ perishing.

·         * Those coaservate drops alone were capable of a more or less protracted existence, which possessed a certain dynamic stability and synthetic speeds exceeding or at least balancing the speed of break down.

·         Contrariwise, those drops in which chemical changes in the given environmental conditions were directed primarily at break down were doomed, in consequence to a more or less swift disappearance or did not originate at all. In any case, their individual life story soon came to an abrupt end, and such formation, therefore, no longer played a consequential role in the further evolution of the organic substance.

·         That role was played only by dynamically stable colloidal formations , and any digression from this stability put them swiftly out of existence and destroyed these “unfortunate” forms of organization

·         Such inadequately organized drops disintegrated and the organic substances they contained were again scattered in the solution, rejoining the depot on which the more “fortunate” and better organized coaservate depended for their nutrition.

·         However, the drops in which synthetic held sway (prevailed) over break down, were not only preserved, but grew and increased in weight and volume.

·         In this way it was the drops which possessed an organization, best suited to the given environmental conditions , that grew in size  *( The Origin of Life, P-1, page 80)

S. V. comments:- Please note the world “fortunate” and “unfortunate” are put by the author (Oparin) himself in double inverted commas. In the above description, the unfortunate forms, that were destroyed, seem to have again rejoined the fortunate or better organized drops, which cannot be without reservation or without inherent desire to take revenge.

The process seems to be simple. (The origin of revenge cycle – concept)

(I)   First weaklings are destroyed.

(II)   The fortunate drops organize themselves.

(III)  The originally destroyed “unfortunate” joins the fortunate for their nutrition, for their survival.

The entity that seeks pleasure which is denied to it gets displeasure. This entity for the lust of pleasure, though submits to the source of pleasure, must have retained dislike and must harbor attitude of revenge. This is very logical conclusion relating to the birth of chain revenge.

It had taken roots at the very first stage and the same tendency has followed up to date.

The physical evolution and psycho evolution cannot be bifurcated.

The revenge cycle includes not only open enemies but also so called friends and relations ultimately turn into ghost of revenge, often in the pretext of affection.

13.6.    An upgrading structure of “revenge cycle” is ruling the living existence.

With the progress of living (evolution) the revenge cycle is also progressing in its complexities. S.V. has given the description of this revenge cycle at each stage from the origin of life.

Material level, Pre virus matter                                                         Virus itself (a paradox and infects animals),

Cell ---- Invaded by virus.

Plants ---- Consumed by viruses and animals.

Animals --- Eaten by higher forms at each stage.

Man --- Revenge within and revenge without.

Families --- Conflicts within members.

Groups ---- Differences of opinions, murders.

Nations ----- Wars.

Races, Religions ---- hate, slaughters

Evidence of this revenge cycle is written in large letters in the history of Biology, Psychology and politics.

13.7.    Replacing other (sweet) words is redundant.

The word ‘revenge cycle’ is replaced by many by other sweet words. But that is not making any difference in the fact of life. True, the reality of the revenge is unpalatably (not easily) acceptable. It is a bitter pill to swallow. But how do all cycles in nature exist?

Thermodynamics second law reference.

We all know that according to the second law of thermodynamics, unavailability of energy is the final destination of the universe. On the contrary, unless the energy is available for exchange, no cycle can survive.

Equation of happiness (Book by S. V.), Chapter 5 points out to the cost paid for the so called development. Every so called development has purchased new disease.

The treaties ‘Cure Yourself’, ‘Cure without Medicine’, ‘Death of decease’, ‘Rich Ambitious Healthy’ are full with account of the internal revenges and counter revenges.

To avoid these contradictions materialists formulated “the law of contradictions” itself. Contradictions, paradoxes, negation of negation, low of force and number of terminologies in their philosophy threw light on nature of Nature.

Darwin: - (who indirectly endorses revenge phenomenon) prefers to call “Natural selection” and treats the nature as despot (ruler with great power who uses it in cruel way). ‘Natural selection’ becomes more mysterious than God, since the former is not bound by the Karmic law. Curiously enough, the counterpart of two axioms (a statement that is accepted as true without further proof or argument) by Darwin “survival of the fittest” comes to very near the origin of revenge cycle, we are delineating. Right from lowest form of the matter, we have provided proof of revenge cycle born or inequality.

13.8.    Symbiosis only till convenient. (Darwinism too proves it!)

Symbiosis means living together in cooperation. But if observed in Nature, such examples are a few.

*Association of living things

Symbiosis, commensalisms and parasitism are three of the categories in which the ecologists, the biologists divide the living things which live together for various reasons. These experts study the way the life of living things and their relations to their environment.

These associations may be formed between

·         animals only

·         plants only

·         animals and plants

They may be as

·         herds of cattle’s

·         flocks of sheep’s

·         communities of ants, bees, wasps (black/yellow flying insects)

·         Colonies formed by corals.

These are the associations between individuals belonging to same species or they could be associations belonging to different species.

Commensalisms, symbiosis and parasitizes all belong to this latter category. The term commensalisms , which means ‘eating at the same table’ was originally given to association between two or more animals belonging to different species, which share each other’s food.

Revenge cycle behind (apparent) symbiosis

Darwin unearthed the revenge cycle behind the apparent symbiosis. He and his followers formulated the evolution theory in three main stages.

1.      Over population --- leading to struggle for existence.

2.      Adaptation --- During this struggle, adjustment by few by mutation and variations.

3.      Natural selection --- Implying survival of the fittest.

Careful review of the views in this book Vis-a Vis the Darwin theory

1.       Carefully looked the original inequalities aggravated the trouble for existence at the stage of over population.

2.       Those who had superiority in original inequalities could affect adaptation, variation and mutation.

3.       The third stage of “natural selection” equated with the axiom “survival of the fittest” is logical.

Our theme states that inequalities were created by ego inflated superiors who were later subjected to revenge cycle.

God, Super power, Mind

Since the three stages in Darwin theory as stated above are logical it affords elimination of God/Super power/Mind. But certain inherent incongruities bring in some super power like Mind. For example: - What was the cause of first inequality mentioned in point 13.2? Answer is given in 13.8 which explain how Mind is brought in. In 13.5 we have seen how materialists, scientists in a bid to avoid super-physical phenomenon, have to introduce the notion of ‘fortunate’ and ‘unfortunates’. In other words, ‘inequalities of mind’ started the first mystery, and equality is the relieving solution.

Symbiosis would remain rare.

Till equality is reached, the revenge cycle is bound to continue, symbiosis would remain rare.

Apart from the fact that partnerships in symbiosis are rare, they only reflect transient truth. More often we see friendship turning into inimical relationship, where mutual convenience ceases to have any exchange benefit.

Symbiosis against parasitism

Rareness of the symbiosis existence will be clearer when we examine its opposite, the parasitic value. Parasitic living is termed so, when living is at the expense of somebody else. If this is so, one must wonder why poor tiny animals are called parasitic. In the human society countless parasites exist according to this definition, and when the man eats goats, dears, cows, buffalos, horses, what type of symbiosis does it betray? What right we have to disdain (dis respect) and condemn parasites?

We venture to quote the book referred above on virus. If we look at the parasites dispassionately (objectively) what will happen .The author says on:-

The tiger and the microscopic carnivore’s hat range through the green and quite dwell in our ponds and streams, these are getting their foods from the bodies of other animals, and these too harm their prey, they kill them, in fact, which is more than the parasites normally do.

Extending our view beyond the animal world, we may consider the cow that crops our fields, the rabbit that does our crop so much of harm, the plants indeed, that feed on insects and other preys. All these seem to fulfill our definition of parasite. How can they be distinguished from parasites?

Is man symbiotic? Peace loving?

It may be argued that normally the man is peace loving animal and prefers symbiosis, since wars are few and peace periods are plenty. We hesitate to argue more on this point since self-check is the best solution. Wars are avoided because they are too costly and not because war tendency is lacking. All stages of peace period are chiefly diverted to the preparation of war

In families and societies conflict is the pass word. Open conflicts are not less, back biting is countless. One who does not vent out open revenge murmurs in his mind ‘every dog has his days, I will have mine.’

Revenge cycle is truth

Greek history, Bible history, Arabian records, Persian records, Indian mythology and whole world history down to this age breathe destruction and revenge. Geeta, Shanti parva are great but oasis spots in Blood Sea of conflicts in Mahabharata. So is the story of major religious works.

We are at pain but the truth is truth.

We are at pain to point out this picture, but some people profess that world is full of peace, they speak either partial truth, convenient truth, or truth with reference to certain context

Such people paint the picture of world as it should be and not as it is. We are underlining the reality and revenge, since correct diagnosis will cure corroding melodies. As it stands therefore, the revenge complex is the real menace (dangerous harm). To fight the ghostly cycle of revenge, the arms of knowledge are the pacifying tools. Knowledge always cures without any bad effect.

13.9 Pleasure to Pain. (Revenge cycle)

We have traced the element of inequality at all levels so far and in 13.6 we have traced the Revenge element from pre virus stage to manhood. Pleasure is the motive, jealous inequality is the mode, cyclic defeats and revenge is the terminating end of each cycle. We shall reach a postulate from reverse i.e. from human angle, human level.

1 Man level: - No proof is required to establish jealous human greed. Man is possibly the greatest parasite. Man is, perhaps the only cruel animal who shoots down the mute innocent in nature just for his pleasure, while the other animals restrict their cruelty for their bare livelihood. Other animals are satisfied with their day’s meal when available. Human greed would like to store for next generation what others need today is grabbed by human parasites for his tomorrow’s fancy. Tomorrow that he may not survive to see. Anyway, human parasitic tendency is self-evident; Omni present, Omni potent.

2 Animal world: - To a limited extent, within its own right, every animal steps down to consume the junior partner in the nature.

3 Free unicellular world: - Single cell animals like protozoa, bacteria that lead independent life

in nature prey upon the organic substances in the ponds. They invade animal world and hit-back as revenge. In the last analysis, we find antigens outlived antibodies without laying down arms. At the upper rank of the ladder they infest the so called towering all powerful animals, and at the other end, they cause inconvenience to sub-cellular existence of psycho world, again, to breed revenge from them in due course. (Cure yourself ch.6)

4     Plants: - Plants indirectly and partly feed themselves on animal remains. Though normally plants behave gently, they are not free from inherent revenge and in some cases they eat other plants and animals. Quite sometimes, the plants feed on their subordinates. (Dear Mr. Boss, page 66-67).

5     Cell in animal body: - The concept of evolution can only be complete if we understand that this development of multi-cellular animal stems from a single cell. Sometimes, free cell convert them to participate in the life process of higher animals. The learned professor Easton tells us as “certain bacteria can manufacture their protoplasm from simple compounds such as carbon di oxide and ammonia. Cells of higher organization have lost the ability to use simple organic materials and instead must be supplied with higher complex molecules….”

Hypothesis of Virus Evolution: - There are only two current hypothesis of viral evolution, both based on the necessity for viruses of strict intra cellular growth.

In 8.2, we have seen that first viruses were not parasites. The only conclusion can be – Viruses were first innocent either as free living animals or part of cell, at least their vengeance was controlled. Subjected to the inconvenience by the upper cell masters, they grew revengeful.

By all standards, when viruses chose to hit back, the top of the hierarchy, the man himself became helpless. Human battle against viruses is countered by tiny tyrant, by mutation without number.

What right man has to blame his junior partners for selfish pleasure when he is pleasure seeking incarnate? And here possibly, the eyebrows would be raised for a question: Whether cell or virus has the same pleasure seeking tendency or not? This is answered in following two sub points.

13.10      Cells – Viruses desire pleasure.

Points 9.5 to 9.8 establish mind to cell.

Point 9.7 quotes Nobel Prize winner Dr. Sherington.

Points 8.9 and 10 elaborate the whole subject in great details.

In a cell life sex also has a place.

We see two science book references below

* In a single cell animal called Paramecium there is a love sickness. It has a smaller form of depression, which occurs under natural condition and which appears to be kind of “love sickness” is curable by something resembling the orthodox remedy. It is in paramecium, lowly though, it may be, that we see the first traces of phenomenon of sex, the dawn of process of a process of life common to the great majority of animals and plants. * (Cine Biology, C-9, page 31)

** Some viruses get so sluggish, that having invaded the cell; they took up housekeeping in nucleus itself. Here they achieved the ultimate in enzyme assistance, but they became also irreversibly dependent on the nuclei. Love sickness, laziness, seeking for the pleasure on one side and the other side of the coin has disappointment and displeasure. Eventually, hit by the inequality, for which they are denied pleasure, revenge is the only resource. ** (The nature of living things, page 59)

13.11   Human cells also desire pleasure.

Once the quandary (a state of unable to decide what to do in difficult situation) of cell is established, the same applies to human cells in view of point 13.9.5 above. Single cell joins multi cellular organism only to seek more pleasure and safety.

·         *Nobel prize winner Dr. Sherington says :-  Many cell organism such as each of us are, were one cell at the beginning  and when it has become many celled , the behavior of constituent cells shows that each one of them , like the parents cells , is still an autonomous unit life.

·         But the behavior of the individual cell in the body is restrained by the influence of its fellow cells. The desistance (stoppage) from further growth beyond the adult stage is partly traceable to this.

·         There is a scrap of tissue from an embryo chick transferred to artificial culture thirty seven years ago , which is growing vigorously as ever now today , If left within the chick , it would have died years ago.

·         Some of our cells, although they are part and parcel of us, have not fixed even coherence with the “rest”; such cells are called “free”.

·         The original cell which started the whole body was free as are all those of that particular kind.

·         And others too are free. The cells of our blood are as free as fish in a stream of the blood. Some of them resemble in structure and ways so closely the little free- swimming amoeba of the pond as to be called amoeboid. The pond amoeba crawls about, catches and digests particles picked up in the pond, so the amoeboid cells inhabiting any blood and lymph crawls about over and through the membranes limiting the fluid channels in the body. They catch and digest particles. Should I get a wound, they contribute to its healing .They give it a chance to mend, by eating and digesting bacteria which, which poison it, and by feeding on the dead cell, which are killed due to the wind injury.

·         They are themselves unit lives and yet in respect to my life as a whole, they are components in that corporate life. * (Man on his Nature, page 75.)

Body cells have paid the cost.

Body cells, as we have seen in the point 13.9.5 have paid the cost of easy life by demanding more safety in the protected multi cellular organism.

·         Cells in the body, if placed outside, could survive longer. There are references to show that in a single body , the capacity of the cell to save is different * (Paths of Science,  pages 56 to 61 and71)

·         It is suggested that the brain cells controlling the organism through the life are more fragile than others.(page 71)

·         Each entity has to pay the price of so called superiority and that is established at every point, of every cell.

·         Organ donation (say eye, kidney etc.) indicate how the cells leave the dying man to his fate and willingly live somewhere else.

13.12      Same law (body cell takes revenge.)

The entire phenomenon is governed by Laws of Motion, Causality.

When ‘organizing mind’ of the organism for its emotional frenzy (state of extreme excitement) hits at its cell empire, that subjects them to those tortures for easy life. The chief despot (cruel ruler, cruel king) also has to pay the cost. In return, the cell empire hits at the ‘organizing mind’

Laws of Motion are universal. In Biology, they may become abstract, but they would not be absent.   

If the ‘organized mind’ acts on the cells, one day or the other, cells are also bound to react. To call such phenomenon revenge, ghost, injustice or paradox is itself a paradox, if not ignorance.

Summary:

-          The talk of establishing equality itself gives ‘Non-material’ nature of mind credence.

-          We saw earlier that the starting point of life was Coaservate drops. Those coaservate drops alone were capable of existence, which possessed a certain dynamic stability and synthetic speeds exceeding or at least balancing the speed of break down. Contrariwise, those drops in which chemical changes in the given environmental conditions were directed primarily at break down were doomed, or did not originate at all. The unfortunate forms, that were destroyed, seem to have again rejoined the fortunate or better organized drops, which cannot be without reservation or without inherent desire to take revenge.

-          The entity that seeks pleasure which is denied to it gets displeasure. This entity for the lust of pleasure, though submits to the source of pleasure, must have retained dislike and must harbor attitude of revenge. This is very logical conclusion relating to the birth of chain revenge.

-          It had taken roots at the very first stage and the same tendency has followed up to date.

-          The physical evolution and psycho evolution cannot be bifurcated.

-          True, the reality of the revenge is unpalatably (not easily) acceptable. It is a bitter pill to swallow.

-          Darwin unearthed the revenge cycle behind the apparent symbiosis.

-          With the progress of living (evolution) the revenge cycle is also progressing in its complexities. S.V. has given the description of this revenge cycle at each stage from the origin of life i.e. from coaservate to virus to cell to multi-cell lives up to human being.

-          Body cells have paid the cost of easy life by demanding more safety in the protected multi cellular organism.

-          Pleasure is the motive, jealous inequality is the mode, cyclic defeats and revenge is the terminating end of each cycle.

-          The revenge cycle includes not only open enemies but also so called friends and relations ultimately turn into ghost of revenge, often in the pretext of affection.

-          Symbiosis means living together in cooperation. But if observed in Nature, such examples are few.

-          Greek history, Bible history, Arabian records, Persian records, Indian mythology and whole world history down to this age breathe destruction and revenge.

-          The author says that we are at pain to point out this picture.

-          Some people profess that world is full of peace. They speak either partial truth, convenient truth, or truth with reference to certain context. Such people paint the picture of world as it should be and not as it is.

-          We (the author) are underlining the reality and since correct diagnosis will cure corroding melodies. As it stands therefore, the revenge complex is the real menace (dangerous harm).

-          ‘Inequalities of mind’ started the first mystery, and equality is the relieving solution.

-          Laws of Motion are universal. In Biology, they may become abstract, but they would not be absent.

-          To fight the ghostly cycle of revenge, the arms of knowledge are the pacifying tools.

(Note: This is an attempt to make readers friendly interpretation of the book “MIND POWER” based on my perception. Inquisitive readers are requested to refer to the original book to cross check their understanding.)

Vijay R. Joshi.